The speaker is John F. Kennedy

The speaker is trying to sell an idea.  The idea he is selling is for all American citizens to have the same right including black people.

He is the President of the United States of America.

I would describe John F. Kennedy as a thoughtful, intelligent, and fair man.

 

The voice is of a man whose personality is compassionate for others.  John F. Kennedy’s point of view on this matter was, how unfair and cruel racism was.

John F. Kennedy’s values and beliefs were kindness, leadership, justice, boldness, compassion, authenticity, determination etc.

Yes the speaker is credible.

I think the speaker was a smart, godly, inspiring man. i think his idea was a fair and humane.

No, the speakers in only selling an idea. He would do that to promote freedom for all American citizens.

I though of him being a smart and just man.

 

 

 

 

Black people were treated unfairly. Society was reflected as a hatred and racist society. The time and place was during John F. Kennedy presidency in the year 1963 in the United States of America during the civil rights crisis. He was prompted to write due to the way black people were treated during this time.

I think it was published to bring awareness to Americans  about racism on black people.

It was published with the potential to have people change their ways toward black people and for the government to implement laws that would provide equal rights for all.

This piece was written with the attempt to create a social change in civil rights.

Absolutely not, I do not think it was brainwashing.

 

 

The text reached all american citizens. I can describe the audience as a mixture of people who hated the black race,  people who wanted to have equal rights for all and black people who wanted freedom, rights and equal opportunities. I do not  understand this question: Do you consider yourself part of this pieces.

He was appealing to and audience that was fair and caring

As a viewer i would describe this as a motivational piece.

This peace was part of a movement toward civil right and freedom to all specially black people. This peace means to me that I can enjoy relationships with black people.  also people of many other races can have civil rights freedom. I think some have mutual agreement with the speaker and others disagree. The assumptions that people needed to make a change.

It influenced them by inspiring them to change.

 

I know the purpose of this peace because it is stated on it.

The purpose of this peace is motivational. The purpose was to defend the civil rights of black people. The purpose was to defend, blame, and teach.

 

 

 

yes the purpose of the message was honorable.

yes, they have the audience best interest.

People who wanted freedom, equality for all.

The message that was sent was that black people deserved to have the same rights as white and that their color did not dictate their freedom.

Yes, the purpose does show integrity, because it was for the benefit of others not of himself.

the texts is about civil rights. I know what the subject is because of the title and it states it on the text.

 

Yes the subject is ethical, because all people should be treated fairly. I think the subject was appropriate for that time and place. Now black people and other races have opportunities and are able to use public places without being judged by their color or by their race.

 

 

 

 

I would see it as a moral constitutional and legal rights. The camera angle was a close, because it showed him up close. There was no music used. I think that it was an educational and motivational  speech, for example:

 

The  assumption that they wanted the same change.  they wanted freedom and equal rights for all. The effect of this devices is to make a change in peoples thinking and ways.

the type of word the text incorporate are encouraging words.  Some words are: freedom, justice, equality etc. Positive emotion words like freedom and  equality. Negative emotion words like segregation.

The overall tone of the text is  a calm tone.  His choice of language affects the interpretation in a positive way.  The author feels passionate about the subject. The author makes me feel encouraged and hopeful.

At the time the speech was given it had the impact of change.

This speech had a positive impact in history.  Yes, I believe this speech is having an impact today.